Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative
The studies consider not only the formal policies and procedures applicable and/or employed in these disputes but also the perspectives and actions of citizens, businesses, investors, the media, mass organizations, and government officials. Case studies were selected for geographic and economic dive...
Được lưu tại giá sách ảo:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | 1-2014 |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Eng |
| Xuất bản : |
1-20
|
| Chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://hdl.handle.net/11742/23630 |
| Từ khóa (tag): |
| _version_ | 1861224684158189568 |
|---|---|
| author | John Gillespie John Gillespie |
| author_facet | John Gillespie John Gillespie |
| author_sort | John Gillespie |
| collection | DSpaceTVQH |
| description | The studies consider not only the formal policies and procedures applicable and/or employed in these disputes but also the perspectives and actions of citizens, businesses, investors, the media, mass organizations, and government officials. Case studies were selected for geographic and economic diversity and involve rural, peri-urban, and urban communities. The cases also vary in their level of private investor involvement and the intensity of the dispute. |
| format | 1-2014 |
| id | oai:http:--thuvienso.quochoi.vn:11742-23630 |
| institution | Thư viện số |
| language | Eng |
| publishDate | 1-20 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:http:--thuvienso.quochoi.vn:11742-236302017-09-06T02:30:47Z Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative John Gillespie John Gillespie Land disputes Phu My Hung Residential Area Resolve public land disputes Vietnam Disputes Dung Quat Economic Zone Authority Hoa Mac Industrial Park Hung Phu Residential Area The studies consider not only the formal policies and procedures applicable and/or employed in these disputes but also the perspectives and actions of citizens, businesses, investors, the media, mass organizations, and government officials. Case studies were selected for geographic and economic diversity and involve rural, peri-urban, and urban communities. The cases also vary in their level of private investor involvement and the intensity of the dispute. 1-2014 2014 1-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/11742/23630 Eng pdf application/pdf The Asian Foundation |
| spellingShingle | Land disputes Phu My Hung Residential Area Resolve public land disputes Vietnam Disputes Dung Quat Economic Zone Authority Hoa Mac Industrial Park Hung Phu Residential Area John Gillespie John Gillespie Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title | Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title_full | Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title_fullStr | Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title_short | Public Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Multi-Actor Analysis of Five Case Studies with an East Asian Comparative |
| title_sort | public land disputes in vietnam a multi actor analysis of five case studies with an east asian comparative |
| topic | Land disputes Phu My Hung Residential Area Resolve public land disputes Vietnam Disputes Dung Quat Economic Zone Authority Hoa Mac Industrial Park Hung Phu Residential Area |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11742/23630 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johngillespie publiclanddisputesinvietnamamultiactoranalysisoffivecasestudieswithaneastasiancomparative AT johngillespie publiclanddisputesinvietnamamultiactoranalysisoffivecasestudieswithaneastasiancomparative |
Conciliation of Land Disputes in Vietnam: A Critical Analysis of Current Law and Practice with Recommendations for Reform